|
|
Photo Gallery | $ Donations $ | Register | FAQ | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-27-2013, 01:25 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Delta, Colorado
Posts: 42
|
351 Cleveland Open Chamber vs Closed Chamber heads
I converted my '70 4bbl Cleveland to open chamber heads so that I don't have to buy Premium gasoline. I'm happy with the performance but wonder how much power did I give up. Anybody got any idea?
|
11-28-2013, 10:04 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: S.E. Mich.
Posts: 3,446
|
Re: 351 Cleveland Open Chamber vs Closed Chamber heads
You went from 11:1 to around 9.5:1. You lost around 40 HP. Maybe even a little more. Is it just a 4V motor or a CJ, Boss?
__________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xHkA5tBV1RE |
11-28-2013, 12:10 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Delta, Colorado
Posts: 42
|
Re: 351 Cleveland Open Chamber vs Closed Chamber heads
Thanks for the reply Roy.
The first one I was a '70 stock M code. The next is a stock '73 Q code CJ. Other than model-year and 4-bolt mains is there any difference? |
11-30-2013, 05:25 AM | #4 |
"God of Thunder"
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: DC
Posts: 1,076
|
Re: 351 Cleveland Open Chamber vs Closed Chamber heads
I'm curious to know why you've chosen open chamber as opposed to closed chamber heads?
|
11-30-2013, 01:00 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Delta, Colorado
Posts: 42
|
Re: 351 Cleveland Open Chamber vs Closed Chamber heads
The lower compression allows me to use regular gas.
|
11-30-2013, 02:10 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: S.E. Mich.
Posts: 3,446
|
Re: 351 Cleveland Open Chamber vs Closed Chamber heads
Im pretty sure the CJ had the big valves and runners like the 4V but had open chambers like the 2V. Some M codes were 4 bolt also. I used to be big into the 351 Cleveland and could tell you all the differences but its been a long time.
__________________
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xHkA5tBV1RE |
11-30-2013, 03:19 PM | #7 |
"God of Thunder"
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: DC
Posts: 1,076
|
Re: 351 Cleveland Open Chamber vs Closed Chamber heads
|
11-30-2013, 03:33 PM | #8 |
Mustang owner since 1984
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 4,515
|
Yes, and hardened valve seats.
__________________
2012 Kona Blue Metallic BOSS MOMS Racing... 11.92@115.43 stock besides drag radials http://www.dragzine.com/news/moms-ra...2013-schedule/ |
12-02-2013, 01:05 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Delta, Colorado
Posts: 42
|
Re: 351 Cleveland Open Chamber vs Closed Chamber heads
Unrealford could you expand a bit on the hardened valve seats? Did the '73CJ have them?
I also posted a question on notching the shock towers. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|