|
|
General Registry Discussion Topics of Interest (Mach 1 Related or otherwise) for discussions that don't fit other forums. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-02-2018, 02:52 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: IL
Posts: 21
|
Mach vs Boss
I keep hearing how the 12-13 Boss 302 will be a collectible in the future due to its limited production, high-revving Roadrunner engine (not Coyote), etc.
"If you can get your hands on one for 30k or less right now, do it" they say. First, what is everyone's opinion on the Boss 302? Next, how does it stack up to say the GT350 and more near and dear to my heart...our Mach 1's? I just did an Eaton swap on my Mach. I intend to keep it for the long haul. That said, I'm wondering if I should've waited, saved a few more pennies and bought a 12-13 Boss instead. |
07-02-2018, 03:09 PM | #2 |
Heppasketties
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mercer County, NJ
Posts: 4,760
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
Don't own a Boss but I own a 2011 Shelby. I traded my Mach in to get the Shelby and for years convinced myself it was the right move because I would have walked past the Mach and just drive the Shelby. Well I bought the same Mach1 back a year ago (I'm the 1st and now 5th owner) and have to say I drive the Mach 1 more now then the Shelby. I really did miss it and am so glad to have it back. I never bought either car as a financial investment it was an investment in fun to which I am getting my moneys worth.
I plan to drive them till I'm too old and then pass them down to my sons. Good luck with either car
__________________
M1R Member #1829 2011 Shelby GT-500 Grabber Blue W/SVT Performance Package Born on Friday, 6-25-2010 Purchased 8-19-2010 2003 Zinc Yellow Auto I/UP (Build #8280 of 9652) Born on Thursday, 7/17/03 Purchased 8-18-2003 first owner Sold 8-19-2010 bought GT500 Purchased again 3-3-2017 fifth owner Purchased for my wife to drive (but she knows I love the car) |
07-02-2018, 03:47 PM | #3 |
Psycho Dog is Psycho
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 1,990
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
Thinking of most any vehicle as a financial investment is a bad idea.
I'd love to have a Boss 302 in the stable, but other expenses have priority at the moment. And the Mach only cost some pocket change in storage insurance to sit in the garage. _ |
07-02-2018, 04:25 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: IL
Posts: 21
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
Quote:
|
|
07-02-2018, 06:28 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Hopinsville
Posts: 163
|
A Boss is one of the very few mustangs newer than 09 that I have any interest in owning.
A comparison between the GT350 and Boss: https://youtu.be/U97I_feu8mE Pick your poison. |
07-02-2018, 08:03 PM | #6 |
Moderating at Mach 1
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 16,271
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
As the owner of both, my answer would be, what are you looking to get out of your car.
You're talking about the best balanced versions of what was offered in each platform. Neither were the fastest of their kind, as there were blowers strapped on to each generation and snake logos affixed. My first thought was, when I got my Boss, that this was similar to the differences in a '69 Mustang and a '73 Mustang. The Boss drives 'bigger', is bigger, has more power. It feels like it belongs to the video game generation, while the Mach 1 is more communicative, feels smaller, more nimble, more strapped on than strapped in. I'm often asked which I prefer. My answer is, I like my Boss, I love my Mach 1.
__________________
Krewe de la Mach Rouge #340804 13th Mach 1 built 11/07/02 Build Date 12/13/02 Delivery |
07-02-2018, 08:38 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SunRiver Ca.
Posts: 3,293
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
Bought our Mach new Sept. 2003 and never ever thought of selling her. Have been approached 5 times in the last three years by people who want to know if it is for sale. This car just has the "IT" factor, are the new cars faster, quicker....sure. Does that make them better....not in my mind. The Boss 302 is a great car, power, looks, handling and heritage. If I could only own a Boss by not having the Mach, I guess I would never own a Boss.
__________________
If we were all ugly, then we would all be good looking! Welcome to the Mach 1 Cafe! "Today's Special..Smoked Honda" Finally a member of 10,000 mile club! |
07-02-2018, 10:04 PM | #8 | |
Heppasketties
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mercer County, NJ
Posts: 4,760
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
Quote:
Love the Mach
__________________
M1R Member #1829 2011 Shelby GT-500 Grabber Blue W/SVT Performance Package Born on Friday, 6-25-2010 Purchased 8-19-2010 2003 Zinc Yellow Auto I/UP (Build #8280 of 9652) Born on Thursday, 7/17/03 Purchased 8-18-2003 first owner Sold 8-19-2010 bought GT500 Purchased again 3-3-2017 fifth owner Purchased for my wife to drive (but she knows I love the car) |
|
07-03-2018, 07:22 AM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: IL
Posts: 21
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
Quote:
I think were I to actually buy a Boss I'd end up feeling the same. I have a gut feeling that I would get in the Boss and wouldn't have the same tug at the heartstrings as I do when I sit in, startup and drive my Mach. I wouldn't mind finding out though. Well said. |
|
07-05-2018, 07:24 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Hopinsville
Posts: 163
|
|
07-06-2018, 08:09 AM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: IL
Posts: 21
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
|
07-06-2018, 08:47 PM | #12 |
Moderating at Mach 1
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 16,271
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
Depends on what you're looking for and what you're looking to spend. The GT500 is a massively powerful car, but the GT350 is a spectacularly balanced car with incredible handling and an engine that makes all the right music. The GT350R I drove is quite possibly the most perfect car I've ever driven.
__________________
Krewe de la Mach Rouge #340804 13th Mach 1 built 11/07/02 Build Date 12/13/02 Delivery |
07-06-2018, 11:06 PM | #13 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Hopinsville
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
They are nice as well. I’m very fond of my Roush, even if it has that POS M90 on it. But the 2.3 TavS will go nicely with the Aluminator engine I have for the car. Pick your poison. |
|
07-06-2018, 11:20 PM | #14 |
Can't be bridled
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,006
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
which roush do you have? i had an 02 360r red/white from 05-07. loved that car, the blower sound was glorious even at part throttle.
__________________
2004 Mach 1 #6956 5spd w/IUP Eaton swap, longtubes, built 3.73 SRA 452hp/409tq dynojet🏁 |
07-07-2018, 10:39 PM | #15 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Hopinsville
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
I have an 08 427R vista blue/pearl white. I agree the blower wine is loud but the blower can’t make any decent power. So I’m getting the 2.3 TVS and I’ll install my P-51 shortblock, then tune it to a safe 600rwhp. Pick your poison. |
|
07-08-2018, 06:09 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 161
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
In my opinion, the 2004 car is the last one that felt muscular. There's just something about that Fox platform that feels raw. Feels powerful. It's poorly insulated. It's loud. It's small. It's got tons of visibility. You sit on the wheel instead of down under the wheel. The interior is cheap plastic. The controls are kindergarten simple. It's all about the experience. When you turn the key on a pre-2005 car it just feels like a fun enthusiast car should feel.
The newer cars are big, heavy, well insulated, with instruments and touch screens and buttons everywhere. They are comfortable and convenient. The gap between a coupe and a sedan has closed with the newer stuff. And to me, that just doesn't feel the same. It's not as fun to drive. A GT350 will smoke my car. So will a Hellcat. So will a ZL1. But none of them feel the same and none of them are as fun as the Mach 1. It's all about the experience. To me, you can't get the same experience with newer cars.
__________________
2003 Mach 1 - TR3650 - Mac O/R H-pipe - Ford Racing driveshaft - Modified air intake - Nitto Motivo 315/35s on 10.5" FR500 wheels - Steeda clutch adjuster |
07-08-2018, 09:51 PM | #17 |
Can't be bridled
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,006
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
With mild bolt ons mine made 399rwhp. I was more than content! It was perfect for ripping around in.
__________________
2004 Mach 1 #6956 5spd w/IUP Eaton swap, longtubes, built 3.73 SRA 452hp/409tq dynojet🏁 |
07-10-2018, 12:35 PM | #18 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Hopinsville
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
There are ways to wake up the cars, but on the 3V the blower maxes out at 8-9lbs of boost, with a 2.49in pulley. Then it heat soaks like a mofo. The TVS blower is substantially better in every way, but the whine department. The M90 is a screamer. Heck my old SSEI Bonneville has an M90 on it and it makes about 8lbs with the stock 3.5+in pulley. Pick your poison. |
|
07-11-2018, 08:45 AM | #19 | |
What's Shakin'
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St Albert Alberta
Posts: 706
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
Quote:
This all day. I actually had this same feeling when I went from my ‘85 5.0 with T-tops to the Mach1. It was lighter, twitchier, and you felt more exposed in hairy situations. I’ve driven a new GT and while a beautiful car, it doesn’t have that same raw feeling that the Mach has. All this being said, the only two cars I would even consider trading the Mach in for would be a 2012-13 Boss or a GT-350. Oh, or maybe a 2000 Cobra R.
__________________
1971 Mustang Coupe Sold 1985 Mustang GT T-tops Sold 2003 Azure Blue IUP Automatic One of 453 #2290 of 9652 Built on February 24th 2003 Eibach Pro-Kit, no ISO's in rear Magnapacks CatBacks Mac O/R X-pipe K&N Drop in filter 4.10 Ford Racing Gears SCT Tuned by Bama Best 1/4 13.34 @ 104.40 Instagram @johnny_kipp |
|
07-11-2018, 01:00 PM | #20 | |
Can't be bridled
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,006
|
Re: Mach vs Boss
Quote:
__________________
2004 Mach 1 #6956 5spd w/IUP Eaton swap, longtubes, built 3.73 SRA 452hp/409tq dynojet🏁 |
|
07-11-2018, 07:58 PM | #21 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Hopinsville
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
The Bonneville M90 is a much more efficient design than the Roush model. But with everything I have planned the 2.3 TVS will be just fine on the Roush, and would be a wiser choice. Being the car will be more road course focused; so a blower that will run cooler longer will be needed. Pick your poison. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|