|
|
General Registry Discussion Topics of Interest (Mach 1 Related or otherwise) for discussions that don't fit other forums. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-09-2018, 10:01 PM | #1 |
Moderating at Mach 1
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 16,270
|
They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
General Motors has actually managed to make the Catfish even uglier than it already was. Couldn't believe it was possible, and had to make sure it wasn't still April 1!!!!
http://autoweek.com/article/car-news...n=awdailydrive
__________________
Krewe de la Mach Rouge #340804 13th Mach 1 built 11/07/02 Build Date 12/13/02 Delivery |
04-09-2018, 10:26 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 132
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
Yeah, I'm definitely not feeling the look of the new '19 Camaro. At least they didn't change the look of the ZL1. GM will probably give the Camaro a nice little power bump to one up the Mustang (475 HP?). I also see the Ford/GM co-developed 10 speed auto finally made it way into the '19 Camaro.
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/chevr...t-look-review/
__________________
2004 Ford Mustang Mach 1 (DSG), Borla Stingers Catback, C&L CAI, SCT X4 Custom Tune, Black Chrome Rovos Durban Wheels (18x9 F, 18x10.5 R) on Nitto NT05s (275/35/18 F, 295/35/18 R), Pioneer AVH-4200NEX Receiver, MM C/C Plates, Rolled Rear Fenders, Eibach Sportlines/Struts/Shocks, Raxiom Smoked Taillights/Third Brake Light/LED Bulbs, Clear Headlights w/ Black Housing, Polished Aluminum Interior Accents, 30% Window Tint, Tinted Side Markers, Carbon Fiber Valve Stem Caps, Black Shorty Antenna |
04-10-2018, 07:51 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 161
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
I'll get hate mail for this, but I like it. I liked what they did with last year's model and the 2019 is really good looking. It's FAR better than the model from 5 years ago. The 2019 looks very Camaro, while incorporating a little bit of retro Corvette styling in the rear. Very sharp car.
And, with the 10-speed on regular SS models now, these will surely be high-11 second cars right off the showroom floor. The outgoing models were already doing low 12s.
__________________
2003 Mach 1 - TR3650 - Mac O/R H-pipe - Ford Racing driveshaft - Modified air intake - Nitto Motivo 315/35s on 10.5" FR500 wheels - Steeda clutch adjuster |
04-10-2018, 07:57 AM | #4 |
it's soo-tack
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 2,082
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
I think the past few years the Camaro has looked amazing. So much I'd consider buying one if it had any driver visibility. Everyone I know that has actually owned one said you might as well be driving a box truck. I don't care for the fully divided front fascia of the '19.
__________________
mark 2004 DSG Mach 1. Built motor. Turbo. 667whp 2006 Sonic Blue Focus. Built motor. Turbo. 12.4 @ 115mph (sold) 2003 DSG Mach 1. 12.65 @ 106 (sold) |
04-10-2018, 07:58 AM | #5 |
Heppasketties
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mercer County, NJ
Posts: 4,760
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
Just not a big fan of the new era Camaro's. I owned a 69 Camaro, the 2010 looked nothing like the original, adding the gills to sides and a pointed nose just didn't do it for me. Especially after the Mustang looked pretty close to the original and the Dodge Charger to me is a spot on remake.
When I purchased the Mach1 back in 2003 it was so much better looking then the outgoing Catfish Camaro model. I was a Chevy guy until I bought the Mach1. Love seeing the factory horsepower wars right now... We are the winners!!
__________________
M1R Member #1829 2011 Shelby GT-500 Grabber Blue W/SVT Performance Package Born on Friday, 6-25-2010 Purchased 8-19-2010 2003 Zinc Yellow Auto I/UP (Build #8280 of 9652) Born on Thursday, 7/17/03 Purchased 8-18-2003 first owner Sold 8-19-2010 bought GT500 Purchased again 3-3-2017 fifth owner Purchased for my wife to drive (but she knows I love the car) |
04-10-2018, 08:53 AM | #6 | |
Guest
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 51
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
Quote:
I agree on the box truck opinion; took trips in a few of them while driving for a dealer, hard to see anywhere but forward. They do look good, but visibility is bad. |
|
04-10-2018, 11:16 AM | #7 |
700 HP Mach
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,384
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
I have no desire to own one but I feel like the new Camaro is actually a step in the right direction for it
__________________
03 dsg mach1 - MPR built 9.5:1 motor, D1, cams, ported intake, full exhaust, magnum t56, built rear, E85 etc... '12 F150 FX2 Supercrew with Ecoboost daily beater |
04-10-2018, 11:41 AM | #8 |
And Leadfoot
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Easy Street
Posts: 6,466
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
Looks better than previous year Camaro's, but I'd still never want to own one.
__________________
'23 Fighter Jet Gray Mach 1 (Automatic, 470hp/410tq) '04 Azure Blue Mach 1 (5Spd., 305hp/320tq) '17 Blue Streak Dodge Ram 1500 Quad Cab 4X4 (Automatic, 395hp/410tq) I'm livin' the Office Space dream. I'm retired, and sit on my azz and do nothing. Every now and then, say What The F***. What The F***, gives you freedom. With freedom comes opportunity. Opportunity, makes your future. If you can't say it.......you can't do it.----Miles |
04-10-2018, 12:45 PM | #9 |
Mach-T
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,865
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
wow; that thing is terrible; looks like it is smiling at you. It just looks completely out of place and the rear tail lights are equally terrible. not sure how this passed the 'look' test.
__________________
Darrell Black '04 Mach 1 Track Times (bone-stock w/drs):60 ft - 1.90 | 1/8 - 8.67 (100 shot,E85,4:10s,Street tire):60 ft - 1.67 | 1/8 - 7.88 New build - 750rwhp; not track tested (yet) Mods: Build Log Paint&Body Tuned by Manny @ HPP |
04-10-2018, 12:52 PM | #10 | |
Lorraine's driver
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,442
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
Quote:
I've liked both Mustangs and Camaro's up until the 93 body change. I thought they ugly. The return models looked okay, and got way better with the 6th gen. This little refresh looks pretty good to me. I think the Mustang looks better, but not a ton better, like I previously thought.
__________________
|
|
04-10-2018, 01:49 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 160
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
Looks like hot garbage!
__________________
1st: 1998 v6 2nd: 2000 GT Current: 2003 Mach 1 |
04-11-2018, 02:44 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: HP, NY
Posts: 1,720
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
Even if it looked good, the driver visibility out of it would be a dealbreaker.
__________________
2003 Zinc Yellow Mach 1, M5, Bassani Catback 2016 White Subaru WRX, Borla S-Type Catback Red Sox, Raiders, and Electric Guitars |
04-12-2018, 07:44 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 161
|
Re: They actually managed to make it even uglier!!!
Honestly, NONE of the three current cars (Camar-slo, Mustang, Challenger) have anywhere near the visibility that our cars have. The SN95/New Edge cars are really easy to see out of.
__________________
2003 Mach 1 - TR3650 - Mac O/R H-pipe - Ford Racing driveshaft - Modified air intake - Nitto Motivo 315/35s on 10.5" FR500 wheels - Steeda clutch adjuster |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|