2003-04 Mach 1 Registry Owners Club  


Go Back   2003-04 Mach 1 Registry Owners Club > "GO" Discussions > Engine & Drivetrain (Including trans & rear axles)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-02-2017, 04:40 PM   #1
JaredWOT
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16
Stroker vs Stock Displacement

Will a cammed stroker reduce gas mileage more than a cammed motor of stock displacement with equal grade cams?
JaredWOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2017, 10:32 AM   #2
littlemags
finally paid for
 
littlemags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ypsilanti Twp, Mi
Posts: 4,077
Re: Stroker vs Stock Displacement

all variables being the same...it shouldn't BUT you have a lot of variables to control.
__________________
2004 mach 1-turbo build in progress..
Fast xfi 2.0
OLD combo-
826rwhp/720 trq -100 shot NX
9.13@154 on 100 shot
NEW- in progress...
littlemags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2017, 10:51 AM   #3
JaredWOT
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16
Re: Stroker vs Stock Displacement

Thank you! That is what I'm asking. Assuming all variables, spark, timing, AF ratio are the same, that a cammed stroker would still be daily driver friendly. It seems like with more air, a larger cam would be needed for the stroker, but I didn't know if a larger cam ALWAYS means more fuel burned. I would like to go with a forged 302 stroker kit and get custom grind cams, but not if it means my daily driver will get 10mpg around the city.
I am about to swap a t56 into the Mach though, so that should help slightly.
JaredWOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2017, 11:00 AM   #4
sutyak
it's soo-tack
 
sutyak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 2,082
Re: Stroker vs Stock Displacement

More displacement and longer duration cam means more air which will require more fuel. If no more fuel is added then the mixture would be lean. The difference between 281 and 302 shouldn't be much, though.
__________________
mark
2004 DSG Mach 1. Built motor. Turbo. 667whp
2006 Sonic Blue Focus. Built motor. Turbo. 12.4 @ 115mph (sold)
2003 DSG Mach 1. 12.65 @ 106 (sold)
sutyak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2017, 11:11 AM   #5
JaredWOT
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16
Re: Stroker vs Stock Displacement

Any idea what a ballpark figure would be for combined mpg with a cammed 302 stroker paired with a t56 using 4.10 gears? Comp cams 106100's are about the aggression level I'm shooting for.
I want to go stroker because of the added power, but also because of the benefit of having more power lower in the rpm's. The car will have a p&p 10" short runner on it. I know that plus cams shifts power upward and helps it wind out farther, but that generally detracts from the low end as well.
JaredWOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2017, 11:50 AM   #6
Vndcatr
SVT
 
Vndcatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 812
Re: Stroker vs Stock Displacement

Quote:
Originally Posted by JaredWOT View Post
Any idea what a ballpark figure would be for combined mpg with a cammed 302 stroker paired with a t56 using 4.10 gears? Comp cams 106100's are about the aggression level I'm shooting for.
I want to go stroker because of the added power, but also because of the benefit of having more power lower in the rpm's. The car will have a p&p 10" short runner on it. I know that plus cams shifts power upward and helps it wind out farther, but that generally detracts from the low end as well.
IMO, i think it more so comes down to the tune. my car is a stock stroke 284 that makes about 400rw and i see probably about 200 a tank lately..Hasnt seen to get worse since being tuned on the 39lb injectors but i also do not daily my car.
I thought id want a stroker super bad for the torque and easy ability to make power, but Compression also allows the motor to make good power! One day ill have a BB stroker setup though
__________________
2001 Zinc yellow SVT Cobra
Forged 11.5CR 284ci
Comp 106500 cams - Degreed
01 cobra Heads - tastefully modded
Roys ported/polished Intake
Kooks longtubes, Magnaflow catback
D&D T3650, Mgw shifted
FTB Goodies, 4.30s, FRPP diff cover, 31 splined IRS
04 cobra interior , black termy seats, Speedhut gauges
Tubular K, MM coilovers/ Koni SA yellows
Starkweather tuned, 24* timing on 91 octane
11.7 @ 117mph 1.62 60ft. Raceweight 3200lbs

Next up:Sullivan intake and hat, self tuning..
Vndcatr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2017, 01:26 PM   #7
JaredWOT
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16
Re: Stroker vs Stock Displacement

I thank you for that! It looks like it depends on he cam and tune that goes along with it. You have a pretty hefty cam in there too! I see that your cobra has the exact suspension I'm looking at, besides the IRS part. Can you tell me, so you consider the cost of the MM coilovers, tubular a-arms, tubular k-member, and the Koni SA Yellows to be worth the cost even if it's mostly a street car that might only see 3-4 1/4 mile passes a year?
JaredWOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) 2002-2013 Mach1Registry.com

<