2003-04 Mach 1 Registry Owners Club - View Single Post

CY-Mach1 · 01-06-2005, 10:47 AM

I can understand holding off on the dyno runs. Thanks for the additional information.

With r50c I'm seeing 22-23 degrees solid through 2nd vs. 19 or less using r50a. While r50a sucked in 3rd and 4th it still outperfomed the factory tune in my car. Timing seems more consistant run to run than earlier verions. I unplugged the knock sensor connection and didn't see a signifigant difference using r50c. Overall I'm pleased with the r50c release. I still really admire run 39!!!!

Is timing curves and knock sensor use the only parameters modified in the custom tune?

01-06-2005, 10:47 AM	#18
CY-Mach1 Driving Mach 1 Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: North Alabama Posts: 311	Re: Predator revisions and timing PART DEUX I can understand holding off on the dyno runs. Thanks for the additional information. With r50c I'm seeing 22-23 degrees solid through 2nd vs. 19 or less using r50a. While r50a sucked in 3rd and 4th it still outperfomed the factory tune in my car. Timing seems more consistant run to run than earlier verions. I unplugged the knock sensor connection and didn't see a signifigant difference using r50c. Overall I'm pleased with the r50c release. I still really admire run 39!!!! Is timing curves and knock sensor use the only parameters modified in the custom tune? __________________ John Mar 04 SAE: 277rwhp/299rwtq w/ flows welded in 13.361 @ 104.73 Oct 04 SAE: 287rwhp/307rwtq w/ weld-in flows, K&N, and Predator Feb 05 SAE: 306rwhp/328rwtq w/ catted x, weld-in flows, K&N, and RWTD Tune