2003-04 Mach 1 Registry Owners Club - View Single Post - Degreeing stock cams

tmhutch · 04-23-2013, 03:07 PM

In the first graph I didnt want short runner intakes or anything else that enhanced high RPM power. I only wanted to show the benefits of Cobra cams at high lobe centers.

The second graph adds only cars with off road pipe (or high flow cats), catback (or mufflers welded in), air filter and in some cases a tune. No Cobra cams, no headers, no ported intakes, no pulleys etc. This was to illustrate that Cobra cams @ 108 ICL dont provide any benefit over stock Mach cams.

From a purely technical standpoint the outcome I'm illustrating is straight forward but cam timing is a pretty challenging subject so I wanted to show real life results from people right here on this forum.

Your car was a real animal with that Naz short runner, and I know a lot of people including myself are really looking forward to your results with the springs, GT followers and FR500. And the ability REV!

04-23-2013, 03:07 PM	#29
tmhutch 4v>3v>2v Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Pacific Northwest Posts: 727	Re: Degreeing stock cams - info needed ASAP In the first graph I didnt want short runner intakes or anything else that enhanced high RPM power. I only wanted to show the benefits of Cobra cams at high lobe centers. The second graph adds only cars with off road pipe (or high flow cats), catback (or mufflers welded in), air filter and in some cases a tune. No Cobra cams, no headers, no ported intakes, no pulleys etc. This was to illustrate that Cobra cams @ 108 ICL dont provide any benefit over stock Mach cams. From a purely technical standpoint the outcome I'm illustrating is straight forward but cam timing is a pretty challenging subject so I wanted to show real life results from people right here on this forum. Your car was a real animal with that Naz short runner, and I know a lot of people including myself are really looking forward to your results with the springs, GT followers and FR500. And the ability REV!