2003-04 Mach 1 Registry Owners Club - View Single Post

Ricksterman · 12-23-2004, 10:37 AM

Oh and btw I did check out version r50c, and the A/F looks good based on my short term fuel trims. Essentially in may car the A/F was 13:1, with the tune leaning out the A/F 2-3% above 4K RPM but that is fine. As far as timing goes I dunno, I am going with the custom tune.

Earlier versions (r50a, b) did not work worth a d**n in my car and leaned the mixture out to over 14:1, and of course there was the fuel adjustment bug....

12-23-2004, 10:37 AM	#6
Ricksterman Registered User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Albuquerque NM Posts: 253	Oh and btw I did check out version r50c, and the A/F looks good based on my short term fuel trims. Essentially in may car the A/F was 13:1, with the tune leaning out the A/F 2-3% above 4K RPM but that is fine. As far as timing goes I dunno, I am going with the custom tune. Earlier versions (r50a, b) did not work worth a d**n in my car and leaned the mixture out to over 14:1, and of course there was the fuel adjustment bug....