2003-04 Mach 1 Registry Owners Club

2003-04 Mach 1 Registry Owners Club (http://www.mach1registry.org/forums/index.php)
-   General Registry Discussion (http://www.mach1registry.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Trivia for today (http://www.mach1registry.org/forums/showthread.php?t=4226)

falcongtho3 05-01-2003 09:14 PM

Trivia for today
 
Thought I'd try to start something different that hopefully everyone can enjoy, Mustang Trivia. I'll try to post a trivia question every day. Answer will be posted that evening.
First one: What item was unique to the (approx.) first 200 1967 Shelby Mustangs and was not seen on any Mustang before or since?

02mach1 05-01-2003 10:03 PM

Re: Trivia for today
 
Quote:

Originally posted by falcongtho3
Thought I'd try to start something different that hopefully everyone can enjoy, Mustang Trivia. I'll try to post a trivia question every day. Answer will be posted that evening.
First one: What item was unique to the (approx.) first 200 1967 Shelby Mustangs and was not seen on any Mustang before or since?

it had 400v8?

Mustang Matt 05-01-2003 10:29 PM

Funtional lower air vents and ducting to the rear brakes

Walt 05-02-2003 01:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mustang Matt
Funtional lower air vents and ducting to the rear brakes
Can't be. The 1994 and 1995 Mustangs had functional side vents (scoops) that exhausted air to the rear brakes.

69mach 05-02-2003 01:45 AM

"After working out production issues, Goodell visited the California Department of Motor Vehicles to see if the modifications would pass inspection. The state had issues with the running lights on the side near the top scoops and a real problem with the distance between the lights in the grille. Back at Shelby American he stopped the addition of the side lights , after 200 cars had gotten them. And he got the designers to work on a new grille moving the high beam lights further apart. He made sure the earlier cars were shipped outside California. Most cars with the letter "Z" preceding the serial number came with the outboard driving light."

The link--
http://www.carmemories.com/cgi-bin/v...perience_id=55
:CHEERS:

falcongtho3 05-02-2003 10:07 AM

The correct answer is: The round lights mounted at the rear of the rear sail panel scoops, the general reason given is that the wiring was a problem as was the supply. Congrats to '69mach'.
I hope you though this a good idea as I would like to continue this as something 'extra'. You thoughts would be appreciated. Oh, and Frank, the GT-500 that years had a 428 8V engine.:THUMBSUP:

Mustang Matt 05-02-2003 10:27 AM

oh well,
I do remember the addition of the lights but didn't know that it was only temporary.
There was functional ducts that were cut early in the production. I just forgot about the 94/95's having them too...

falcongtho3 05-02-2003 11:47 AM

Other Shelby's had funtional ducts as well, in addition to the '94/'95 ducts. Stay tuned for the next one, it should be a doozy.

02mach1 05-02-2003 12:15 PM

Ok, bring on:THUMBSUP:

falcongtho3 05-02-2003 09:06 PM

It is brung!:LAUGH:
For today:Larry Shinoda is famous for the graphics put on the Boss 302 Mustang. When designing the 1969 Boss 302, what 2 exterior pieces/trim items did he do away with on all production Boss 302s for1969. These are items found on all 1969 fastbacks and Mach 1's, but did not appear on '70's at all. (PS, I am not going to get so minute as to get into wiring conectors, lug nut variations, etc. This is for fun. Warning, tomorrow will be Cobra stuff, you have been warned!) Good luck, and may the force be with you.

Julio 05-02-2003 10:08 PM

Wasn't it the scoops and spoilers, I think he didn't want anything on the car that wasn't functional....

69mach 05-03-2003 01:34 AM

1. Non functional quarter scoops

Walt 05-03-2003 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by falcongtho3
Congrats to '69mach'.

Does '69mach' have his choice in colors for his new mach, or does he have to accept what ever color your mach is in?

:COOL:

69mach 05-03-2003 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by falcongtho3
what 2 exterior pieces/trim items
Does the "s" in scoops make it 2 items, or are we still looking for something?:??:

Julio 05-03-2003 06:02 AM

I remember reading a interview with him and he said that he didnt like the side scoops or the rear spoiler...

falcongtho3 05-03-2003 09:46 AM

69mach makes it a good run. The quarter panel scoops were deleted because Shinoda didn't want anything non-functional messing up the looks of the car, which brings us to the second item...the sail panel 'horse' emblems. I've found most people don't notice this deletion, but it happened.
Since I won't be around on Sat. night, I'm gonna put up a really good one that'll be answered on Sunday. Hint: Shelby, fire, bunnies...:D

falcongtho3 05-03-2003 08:55 PM

Not Mustang
 
I know this isn't quite a Mustang question, but it does relate to Ford Performance...so put on your thinking caps!:THUMBSUP:
Question: How many Cobra Daytona Coupes were built, and how many are in existance today? This does not mean kits, replicas or the incredibly ugly Daytona Super Coupe.
Bonus: What recent suspect in a high profile murder case owned a Daytona? And what do 2 incidents of fire and bunnies have to do with the car owned by the same person?
Have fun...answers Sunday!:D

toddb2 05-03-2003 09:50 PM

I don't know about the numbers. The famous person/murder case is Phil Spector the record producer. The fire and bunnies is Donna O'harra (sp?) who took her rabbits under a bridge and burnt herself to death. I believe that the car is now tied up in law suits over ownership.

Todd

I think that there were six built but I don't know how many remain.

falcongtho3 05-05-2003 08:59 AM

:THUMBSUP: Todd! Right on all. The Daytona owned by both of them (not at the same time, but that lawsuit was finally settled) also caught fire in it's intial race at the Daytona Continental (now the Rolex 24hrs. of Daytona). There were a total of 6 Daytona's built. All are accounted for, the O'Hara car only coming to light after her death and subsequent scramble that ensued.

falcongtho3 05-05-2003 08:37 PM

Monday
 
Since it's Monday, heres a less intense one: What was the only year you could not get a V-8 in a production Mustang?

Verk 05-05-2003 08:57 PM

Re: Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by falcongtho3
Since it's Monday, heres a less intense one: What was the only year you could not get a V-8 in a production Mustang?
The first year of the Mustang II, 1974. Base engine was 140-cid (2.3-liter) 2-bbl four with the 171-cid (2.8-liter) 2-bbl V6 as an option.

Twister Special 05-05-2003 09:57 PM

Re: Monday
 
Quote:

Originally posted by falcongtho3
Since it's Monday, heres a less intense one: What was the only year you could not get a V-8 in a production Mustang?

1974

falcongtho3 05-06-2003 09:57 AM

Yes, 1974...a less than stellar year for Mustang performance.

Twister Special 05-06-2003 12:30 PM

wasn't that the year they had the stallions??

02mach1 05-06-2003 01:01 PM

Plus it was the 74 Motortrend car of the year too:cool:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) 2002-2013 Mach1Registry.com